Validitas Audio To Text Recording dalam Penulisan Berita Persidangan : Studi Kasus di PA Kabupaten Malang

ABSTRAK

Melihat tingginya jumlah perkara tahun 2016 mencapai 9.967 kasus dan tahun 2017 mencapai 9.766 kasus yang diterima Pengadilan Agama Kabupaten Malang, aplikasi Audio To Text Recording (ATR) berperan untuk mempercepat proses persidangan sehingga masyarakat bisa cepat dalam mengurus perkaranya. Selain itu, keberadaan sistem ini juga berdampak langsung pada Hakim dan Panitera atau Panitera Pengganti. Oleh karenanya, penelitian ini memfokuskan pada bagaimana pandangan hakim dan panitera mengenai kevalidan Audio To Text Recording (ATR) dalam penulisan berita persidangan.

Tujuan penelitian ini yang pertama untuk mengetahui tingkat kevalidan Audio To Text Recording dalam penulisan berita acara persidangan. Kedua untuk mengetahui Pandangan Hakim dan Panitera Mengenai Kevalidan Sistem Audio To Text Recording (ATR) di Pengadilan Agama Kabupaten Malang. Penelitian dikategorikan sebagai jenis penelitian lapangan (field research) dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif. Sumber data dalam penelitian ini, terdapat dua data yakni, data primer dan data sekunder yang kemudian dilakukan dengan tehnik penelitian pengumpulan data berupa wawancara dan dokumentasi. Selanjutnya, peneliti melakukan editing, classifying, verifying, analisis data.

Dari hasil penelitian ini tingkat kevalidan dipengaruhi beberapa hal seperti harus menggunakan bahasa Indonesia yang baik dan benar, dan menggunakan bahasa jawa yang sering diucapkan dipersidangan, berbicara dengan jelas dan lantang di persidangan supaya aplikasi Audio To Text Recording (ATR) bisa merekam dengan jelas. Namun dalam pelaksanaanya dilapangan sering kali didapati pihak-pihak yang berperkara tidak menggunakan bahasa Indonesia yang baik dan benar, pengucapan suara kurang jelas dan lantang sehingga tidak terekam oleh aplikasi Audio To Text Recording (ATR), dan para pihak sering menggunakan bahasa jawa. Dari hal-hal tersebut peneliti menyimpulkan bahwa tingkat kevalidan aplikasi Audio To Text Recording (ATR) dilapangan masih kurang valid sehingga tidak jarang panitera dan hakim bekerja dua kali untuk mengedit hasil perekaman aplikasi Audio To Text Recording (ATR) di persidangan.

ABSTRACT

The high of cases in 2016 reached 9,967 cases and in 2017 reached 9.766 cases that were received by the Religious Court of Malang Regency, Audio To Text Recording (ATR) application plays a role to speed up the trial process so that people can quickly take care of the case. In addition, the existence of this system also has a direct impact on the Judge and Registrar or Substitute Registrar. Audio To Text Recording (ATR) can also solve the validity problems of trial results data and the best solution when the number of Judges and Substitute Registrars is reduced. Therefore, the research focuses on the views of judges and Registrar about the validity of Audio To Text Recording (ATR) in writing the trial news.

The purposes of the research are, first, to know the level of validity and Audio To Text Recording in writing the trial news. Second, to know the views of Judges and Registrars about the validity of Audio To Text Recording System (ATR) in Religious Court of Malang. Research was categorized as a type of field research (field research) that used a descriptive qualitative approach. The sources of data in the research, those were two data, namely, primary data and secondary data which was done with research techniques of data collection in the form of interviews and documentation. Furthermore, researcher conducted editing, classifying, verifying, data analysis.

From the results of the research, even though the judges and Registrar declare valid data but the researcher here has different views, namely invalid, because the level of validity is influenced some things, such as the use of the Indonesian language that is good and right, and using the Java language that is often pronounced in the hearing, talking with clear and loud in the trial so that Audio To Text Recording (ATR) applications can record clearly. But in the implementation of the field is often found the parties do not use the good and true Indonesian language, sound pronunciation is unclear so it is not recorded by Audio To Text Recording (ATR) application, and the parties often use Java language. From these things, the researcher concluded that the validity level of Audio To Text Recording (ATR) application is invalid so that it is not uncommon for Registrar and judges to work twice to edit the recording application results of the Audio To Text Recording (ATR) in the trial.