Rofiq, Zainur (2010) A critical discourse analysis of Derogation and Euphemization in Ahmadinejad’s international speeches. Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim.
| 
              
Text (Fulltext)
 06320071.pdf - Accepted Version Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. (1MB) | Request a copy  | 
          
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) has become a very influential academic research activity across subjects in social, political, educational, and linguistic sciences. It scrutinizes the power relations, ideological manipulations, and hegemony used among the people manifested in texts. Therefore, it is always interesting to investigate an influential world leader‟s way to set the domination or derogation  over  the  opponents  and  euphemization  of  his  side  to  achieve  the wanted interests through the language. This thesis is an attempt to explain the research problems of how Ahmadinejad, as the president of Iran Republic, uses the discursive  strategies  of  derogation  and  euphemization  in  the international forum‟s speeches. The researcher decides to select his speeches at the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) in 2008 and  Durban Review Conference
2009.
To answer the problems, the researcher adopts van Dijk's CDA framework of self-representation and negative other- representation (in-groups vs. out-groups ideologies) through euphemization and derogation leading to ideological based domination and hegemony in the texts. Methodologically, the researcher employs descriptive qualitative study as his research design. The data are collected by skimming and intensive reading to find out the aspects of discourse.
The findings reveal that Ahmadinejad uses the derogation and euphemization to strengthen in-group‟s stance and their ideologies as well and to downgrade  or  mitigate  the  power,  authority,  and  strengths  of  the  out-group member states showing the intention of the in-groups to dominate and marginalize the out-groups. In the tactics of derogation, he uses the strategies of actor description, number game, burden show, disclaimers, implication, norm expression,  and  negative  lexicalization,  meanwhile  in  the  tactics  of euphemization, he uses national-self glorification, evidentiality, and disclaimer. Therefore, this study is in line with van Dijk‟s theory of positive self- representation and negative other-representation which is mainly made up from
derogation and euphemization.
The researcher suggests the next researchers to focus on discussing common and effective tactics revealed in the present study, such as actor description, number game, disclaimer, and lexicalization.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Undergraduate) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supervisor: | Susilowati, Meinarni | ||||||
| Contributors: | 
  | 
          ||||||
| Keywords: | Derogation; Euphemization; Critical Discourse Analysis; International Speeches; United Nations General Assembly; and Durban Review Conference | ||||||
| Departement: | Fakultas Humaniora > Jurusan Bahasa dan Sastra Inggris | ||||||
| Depositing User: | Meirisa Anggraeni | ||||||
| Date Deposited: | 10 Mar 2023 09:29 | ||||||
| Last Modified: | 10 Mar 2023 09:29 | ||||||
| URI: | http://etheses.uin-malang.ac.id/id/eprint/48211 | 
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Actions (login required)
![]()  | 
        View Item | 
        